Friday, April 6, 2018

Personal: Doug Stauffer Comes Clean


Dear Friends of the Ministry,

Over the past few months, I have come under some concerted  attacks from two men that have banded together with a common cause. I have reached out to these men but based upon feedback I am receiving from pastors in various locations, the unwarranted attacks continue to escalate. In response, I have determined to answer some of the slanderous accusations, along with providing some detailed correspondence between myself and these individuals. Ultimately, my goal at this juncture would be for reconciliation and cessation of the unjust attacks upon myself, my ministry, the ministries of my home church and pastor. If these men have the Christian character expected of God’s men, they will cease and desist, along with rectifying their tale-bearing among the brethren, but ultimately that is between each of them and their God.

You will note asterisks (*) throughout this letter. They are there to denote material presently left out to give these men further opportunity to reconcile without exposing any unnecessary dirty laundry that would serve as a fuller disclosure. If these men reconcile, the asterisks will remain in place. Should the slanders and attacks continue, asterisks will be replaced by the information the asterisks represent. This blog is intended to be informational and conciliatory, whereas, the escalation providing the deleted material will likely make any reconciliation much more difficult or nigh impossible. This blog is in no way intended to threaten or even warn anyone, but intended to set the record straight and defend against what I consider blatant wickedness.   

Background on One Book Rightly Divided

I wrote One Book Rightly Divided—first edition—from 1997 to 1999 while an assistant pastor in Alabama. The work began after being encouraged to put the material in print by Dr. Bill Grady who heard me teach on dispensationalism at a men’s retreat in  December 1996. The book was published in 2000 with the Acknowledgments page stating, “Dr. Bill Grady, my cattle prod in the Lord. Thank you for pushing me when I got bogged down and being the one that convinced me to write this book” (emphasis added). 

While I greatly appreciate his encouragement and support, I look back on the circumstances with regret that he was the primary reviewer of the book, because as he has said about that time, he did not “know the difference between right division and a right hook.” There is no doubt Dr. Grady did the best he could with his limited background in dispensational teaching but I needed more when writing about such a highly doctrinal subject.

One of the most hotly contested aspects included in the original edition (and the Second Edition) included salvation by works outside this present dispensation. Although the book admittedly contained much good information and reportedly helped a lot of people, it also contained some material that I later came to regret as I increasingly realized that some of the positions were both unscriptural and indefensible. I wrote the book based on what I had learned in Bible college. 

As I have said many times since, I basically regurgitated what I had been taught by Dr. Dave Reese who was deemed by many to be a hyperdispensationalist, especially by those in Pensacola. For instance, after an article entitled “Reese’s Pieces” attacking Dr. Reese’s dispensational teaching was published in the BB Bulletin in the late 1980s, I wrote Dr. Ruckman a letter defending Dave Reese. I could not understand why Dr. Ruckman would find Dave Reese’s teaching hyperdispensational since I had always assumed that much of the material originated with Dr. Ruckman’s own teachings. Many years later, Brian Donovan also attacked my book from the pulpit and the bookstore has never carried it for sale. I was told they refused to sell the book because it was too dispensational.

At the time that I published the book, being quite na├»ve of the differing positions and completely ignorant of the schisms on these subjects, I just figured if you could “prove” something from scripture, it must be true. Wow! At the time, I believed what I wrote was the right way to teach the Bible and probably even the only way. Fortunately, I am a perpetual student. 

In 2002 (2 years after the initial publication), I was criticized for my dispensational positions contained in the book by numerous men, most notably, David Cloud and Shelton Smith (a front-page article in the Sword of the Lord labeled me an Ultradispensationalist). These assessments caused me to go from meetings every week to many fewer meetings over the next couple of years. Despite all that, I did not waver from my position of works salvation in the Second Edition, that was until 2006 when I was again being asked to get the book back into print. Part of me, due to the uncertainties I was experiencing, wanted to just leave the book unpublished. Another part of me was wondering how I could be certain about anything we were teaching with so many unanswered questions and schisms. I really wanted to nail down the truth before I took a stance on this position. I believe I am there now (April 2018)! 

In the early 2000s, my sharpest student from the Bible institute began to question much of what we were teaching and I was writing concerning works salvation, Acts 2:38 application, Hebrews through Revelation being “tribulation” books, etc. Because I was more adept in the scriptures, I would simply dismiss him with the one-liners, like, “you can’t retroactively apply Paul back to the Law,” etc. This dismissive reaction worked for a time, but he kept coming back to me (and others on the church staff) with more questions, more letters, etc. (I still have much of this correspondence.) Most preachers would simply label him a pain in the neck and try to ignore him. To this day, I wish I had had a better understanding of true biblical dispensationalism in a few more areas, because I might have been a better guide to him. Yet, his insights into our doctrinal holes led him to reject the teaching altogether instead of finding the doctrinal ground upon which God intended him to land.

Finally, in October 2005, I gave this young man a copy of a marked-up book with some of my projected changes because I felt the Lord would have me make some significant changes before republishing the book in 2006. I did not appreciate it at the time, but the Lord had used this young man to get me to question enough of my teachings to slow down my dogmatism. My conflicted understanding became so great that I removed works salvation from what became called the Expanded Edition, published in 2006. 

I was not completely convinced about all the details but knew that I could no longer sufficiently defend that position and I certainly did not believe that it was an integral part of teaching dispensationalism or even dispensational salvation. The multitudes of people helped by the Expanded Edition of the book attest to the same mindset amongst thousands of others since more have read that edition than all the other editions combined. When I informed Dr. Grady in 2006 about removing the works element from dispensational salvation, he became extremely agitated ...

(*)

Here are a few of those pages from my student that really got me thinking in 2005 about some of the aspects in the early editions. I wondered how these issues could be so polarizing even among my own church members ... and there were several others in the church questioning these teachings; most left quietly. 








I have not been able to reconnect with this once young man, but I certainly commend him for his spiritual fortitude to stand up and be heard. Sometimes you have to be willing to receive the ridicule, not because you have everything figured out but simply because you don't!

In 2009, my desire for forthrightness and integrity demanded that I meet with my pastor and assistant pastor in Alabama to ensure that they knew my position was moving away from the long-standing position of the church concerning works for salvation, when Peter understood the cross, etc. We met for several hours and after that time my influence in the church was minimized. The questioning of a works-based salvation in previous and future dispensations was not an acceptable position. While I understand that they reacted the way they thought they needed to for the good of the ministry, I longed for opportunities I once enjoyed to minister to the saints I loved so dearly in my home church. Either God was working with me or I was certainly squandering some opportunities. 

Finally, in 2013, a few years after these meetings, my family and I determined that God wanted us to relocate to Knoxville. This move was for multiple reasons: (1) my ministry and that of the church in Knoxville (especially of the pastor) were uniting in the writing, printing, and distributing of Bible-believing, Bible-teaching materials, and (2) the doctrines held by the church in Knoxville and now pastored by Andrew B. Ray more closely aligned with my changing dispensational position. Additionally, this church was previously pastored by David F. Reagan who had encouraged me to moderate my dispensational teachings before his passing to heaven in 2007. His influence also helped me to continually question my doctrinal stances rather than forcing the Bible to fit in man-made boxes simply because I could prove it needed to be in there.

In 2014, the book was again out of print, and my conflicts arose once again. I initially began to rewrite the book through mid-2015, this time co-authoring it with my new pastor, Andrew Ray. I stopped the progress because I was unsure that the changes we were incorporating would even allow this to be considered the same work. I wanted peace from God about the matter; which I now have!!!! While One Book Rightly Divided was on the back burner, my pastor and I co-authored seven other books including two books on prophecy, Reviving the Blessed Hope, and When the End Begins

During the writing process for these two prophecy books, I read several dozen books that were not pre-tribulational books so that I could address the weaknesses in our position. I even engaged some post-tribulational men who I knew would harshly critique the material as we were progressing. The study, the insights and especially the critical feedback with those two books convinced me that we should resume the work on One Book Rightly Divided: The Prophetic Edition once our plate was cleared a bit. This time we needed some input from friends and foes alike. 

This time, instead of having the inherent limitations with one primary reviewer, I would pull together about 50 men from one end of the spectrum to the other, especially some who would naturally challenge some of the dispensational teachings. This seemed wise to me but turned out to be one of the most scrutinized aspects of the current project because some of the men asked to be involved have historically challenged various aspects of dispensational truth. We also asked the men to take into consideration that this was a work in progress and it would take some time to get sufficient input to move beyond the draft stage. We also did not want additional distractions that come from those hearing rumors about this and that. Well, that did not last long!

Yesterday (April 7, 2018), I again reached out to one of these men who likened my request for patience to the secrecy of the heretics, Westcott and Hort. Before I learned of their tactics, I wondered why two preachers, after talking to Dr. Grady, cancelled me for future meetings and started the whole phone conversation with an uninterrupted dialog about how he could never have a Bible corrector in his pulpit. I have seen this type of guilt by contrived association used by corrupt politicians and the media but NEVER anticipated being on the receiving end by someone that only three months ago, I would have called a GOOD friend. These wicked attempts to liken me to two of the most vile Bible rejecters  is nothing short of treachery and deceit; certainly a fiery dart of the wicked (Ephesians 6:16)

I do not regret how we approached this daunting task, because I felt it was wise to institute the same system that was so beneficial  on the highly acclaimed prophecy books. I also wanted much counsel since I am just a fallible man (Proverbs 11:4). As we approach the conclusion of this project, I must confess that this process has served us well. In the end, the input from so many sources has made the book better, more complete, and more doctrinally sound. In some cases, the criticisms/insights/comments in the latest chapters have been longer than the chapters being reviewed by these individuals. This has become a treasure trove of spiritual input!

(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)

Ultimately, I still believe in dispensational salvation (i.e., I refute the teaching that men looked forward to the cross for salvation in the Old Testament). Things that are different are simply not the same. However, I have throughout the years let it be known that my position on the inclusion of works within the dispensational salvation framework was changing as I was finding this aspect more troubling and less defensible on dozens of fronts. Churches, pastors, and individuals who had supported my ministry in the past all know of my questioning the works aspect and almost all of them think works-based salvation in other dispensations is critical and the majority have ceased to support my ministry. So anyone thinking that I am benefiting financially from doing what I believe to be right simply has no clue whatsoever. In fact, they are inexcusable for with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged (Romans 2:1-3; John 7:2).

The shift has been financially costly but worth studying to not be ashamed (2 Timothy 2:15). This process has been a LONG process and comes as an attempt to be more scripturally accurate. My heart’s single desire is to please the Lord, although I often fail. Unfortunately, my detractors have claimed that my change of position is for “political reasons” which is ludicrous since my bread has always been buttered by those turning on me now. (This is where you pause and try to figure out my motivesfinancial, political or God-first).  

Those who think I benefit politically or financially also know that I could have simply reprinted the book, as is. If I would have done so, the pre-publication sales would have easily topped $15,000 to $25,000 from the pent-up demand. (And the Expanded Edition does not even contain a work-based dispensational salvation.) In all good conscience I could not simply reprint the book since there were other changes that needed to be made, most notably how to deal with Hebrews through Jude, etc. Knowing my intentions, I had to refuse money from people who offered to pay the reprinting costs of the Expanded Edition. I could not in good conscience have printed the book without editing it or making each of them aware of my refusal of any work-based salvation even though it has not been in the book for over a decade.

Moving forward on the book, as it is today, is my attempt to please the Lord and not man (Galatians 1:10). Presently, I have meetings being cancelled because I will not kowtow to positions held dear by my band of detractors. I guess what troubles me most are the attacks on my testimony and integrity by these men I once considered friends and certainly brethren in the faith, but unfortunately, this has been the modus operandi when fellow Bible believers disagree over minutia. And yes, minutia, because how a man is saved before Christ or after the Rapture does not affect one soul in the Church Age! Yet, to some it has become a fundamental of the faith and a reason to cause discord among brethren that agree on 98% of the Bible. 

According to them I am deceptive because I wanted to nail down the truth and understand my weaknesses before I was pigeonholed and labeled. I simply desired to find the safety that God says comes from a multitude of counselors (Proverbs 11:14). I do not apologize for believing that I was wrong and trying to fix those teachings. However, I do apologize if my actions in any way brought disgrace to the Lord or had the appearance of evil. For that I am truly sorry.

In the end, I will stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ, as will every other believer. I want to serve the King of kings and Lord of lords and I wake up every morning prayerfully desiring to do His bidding. My prayer is that those who have pre-judged me as a traitor to the truth (many of whom have had access to only an early draft of the first three chapters of the revised work) will humbly approach the throne of grace and ask God what He thinks of their deceptive actions. If I have truly wronged anyone, in any way, I ask that you forgive me and pray for me as “I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men” (Acts 24:16).

Some might wonder—is it worth it all? At times I wonder that myself. BUT, if I am pleasing and glorifying God, He will be the final arbitrator. If I am not pleasing Him, well, it will not be because I failed to give it my best shot. 

(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)
(*)

Because of Calvary, 
Doug Stauffer 

P. S. Pray for us! The first few chapters are already linked to my website. 

P.S.S. Anyone who has ordered this book prior to today (April 8th, 2018) but believes that this issue changes your desire for the material, you can request a full refund/email removal, etc. before the end of the month—no questions asked. Blessings!

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

One Book Rightly Divided (Chapter 2)


One Book Rightly Divided (DRAFT Unpublished 2018 edition)

Chapter 2: Bible Overview? 

Read Chapter 1 first!


[Buy the book at www.BibleDoug.com]


Having established the purpose of this work in the previous chapter, our attention now turns to establishing the groundwork upon which future chapters will build. The Lord Jesus Christ clearly identified the foundational principles involved in methodical Bible study. In one instance, He pointed to three distinct divisions calling them “the law of Moses,” “the prophets,” and “the psalms.”

Luke 24:44 written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,

Christ referred to these three divisions within “the scriptures. It is important to note that His referencing these three divisions helps visualize the fact that God intended for the body of scripture to be divided. Yet, even these three simple divisions do not cover the entirety of the Old Testament. These designations simply illustrate that the scriptures can be (and should be) divided into parts because of the need for methodical Bible study.

Word of Caution


Dividing the scripture into sections can become quite complex with its own unique set of potential pitfalls. For example, the last seventeen books of the Old Testament (Isaiah through Malachi) present a prominent prophetic emphasis. This does not exclude other books from containing prophecy. In fact, prophecy can be traced all the way back to the opening chapters of Genesis (Genesis 3:15).

Additionally, the Book of Psalms contains an extensive amount of prophecy. These truths are important to note since the Lord Jesus Christ declared that all “scripture” (meaning the entirety of the Old Testament) testified or prophesied of Him. In fact, Jesus frequently spoke of the existing Old Testament scriptures as prophesying of events in His day. Along with the example from Luke chapter 24 mentioned earlier, here is another example:

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.

Unlike the charts from the previous chapter, the next few charts are not intended to illustrate any type of timeline. Instead, these charts serve as a basic overview of the divisions of the books of the Bible as found in the Old and New Testaments. Take note that these are not intended to be hard, fast divisions, but reflect the primary emphasis of the specific contents within each division.

Old Testament Book Divisions




Section AThe Pentateuch: Five Books, Genesis through Deuteronomy, primarily covering the 2,500 years from the creation of man to the death of Moses. After detailing God’s creative work, focus almost immediately shifts to God’s dealings with the first couple in a garden in Eden. The time period ends with God focused upon one nation wandering through the wilderness.

Section B—History: Twelve Books, Joshua through Esther, covering nearly a 1,000-year period reflecting an emphasis on Israel’s historical record. This record begins with the initial conquest of Canaan and ends with the Jews scattered (some into captivity while others remained in the land of promise). This section chronicles the rise of the judges and the establishment of the kings along with the captivities and the multiple returns of the Jewish people into their promised land.

Section C—Poetry: Five Books, Job through Song of Solomon, grouped more for the type and nature of the content rather than any chronological order. This section is noted for its literary beauty (from the tale of Job’s loss turned to triumph, to the songs of the Old Testament saints, to the great thinker Solomon who wrote about the sheer vanity of all things under the sun).

Section D—Prophecy (Old Testament): Seventeen Books, Isaiah through Malachi, commonly divided into Major Prophets (Isaiah-Daniel) and Minor Prophets (Hosea-Malachi) with these designations based on the length of their respective messages. (Note: Lamentations is smaller than several of the so-called Minor Prophets, yet it sequentially falls within the Major Prophets and has a direct association with the Major Prophet Jeremiah.)

These seventeen books center around the captivities and restoration of God’s chosen people, the Jews. Much of its content has been fulfilled in part and will find a complete fulfillment when God restores the Jewish people. Sometime following the Rapture of the Church Age saints, God will turn His attention back to the nation of Israel.

New Testament Book Divisions




Section EThe Gospels: Four Books, Matthew through John, covering approximately thirty-three years of events, commencing with the conception of John the Baptist and ending with the final ascension of the Lord Jesus Christ back into Heaven.

Although the specific themes vary in each of the gospel books, they serve the general purpose of presenting the person and overall work of the Lord Jesus Christ amongst the Jews. Among other details, this section chronicles: Christ’s baptism, His ministry, His calling and equipping of twelve disciples (later called apostles), His betrayal, His unjust crucifixion, His triumphant resurrection, and His final ascension back to the Father in Heaven.

Section FThe Acts of the Apostles: One Book, Acts, commencing with the time period immediately preceding Christ’s ascension back into Heaven which aligns with the final event recorded in the previous section. The book of Acts concludes with Paul’s imprisonment in Rome.
This book chronicles the acts (or actions) of the apostles similar to how the Old Testament books of First and Second Kings and First and Second Chronicles covered “the acts of” the kings. It spans approximately forty years, purposefully majoring upon the historical record.

The nature of this book necessitates its standing alone especially because of its transitional nature (i.e., Peter to Paul, Jew to Gentile, signs to no signs, etc.). Much of the applicable doctrine and practical instructions taught during this period are more extensively covered in the epistles following the book of Acts. However, not every church practice found in the book continues throughout the epistles.

Note: Although the purpose of the book of Acts primarily serves as a historical record, remember that “All scripture … is profitable for doctrine (2 Timothy 3:16). As with any application, the reader’s crucial starting point when reading Acts involves considering by whom, to whom, and at what time the doctrine was being conveyed. Most false teachers, religious sects, and cults have ignored this important study feature to the detriment of themselves and those whom they influence.

Section GThe Epistles: Twenty-One Books, Romans through Jude, containing the vast majority of the doctrinal and practical teachings received by the early Church.  While it is true that these teachings directly applied to churches and individuals living during the first century, the doctrines and practical instruction were intended to apply to saints for the duration of the Church Age. 

It is important to note that the majority of the teachings within this section were specifically given to the apostle Paul for the Church. In fact, by design, his name is the first word in the first thirteen epistles in this section which are combined together to focus the reader on the truths taught therein. Check it out by reading the first word in the book of Romans through Philemon in a King James Bible.


Romans 1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ
1 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ
2 Corinthians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ
Galatians 1:1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men,
Ephesians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ
Philippians 1:1 Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ
Colossians 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ
1 Thessalonians 1:1 Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus
2 Thessalonians 1:1 Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus
1 Timothy 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God
2 Timothy 1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ
Titus 1:1 Paul, a servant of God
Philemon 1:1 Paul, a prisoner of Jesus Christ


Note: This section of twenty-one epistles has often been further divided and classified into the Epistles and the General Epistles with a single division placed between the books of Philemon and Hebrews.  Not only does this division create potential misconceptions, but it is inaccurate.  An epistle is a General Epistle when addressed to a general audience.  Johns second and third epistles do not fit this description. 

Unfortunately, any rigid application of this classification creates additional problems. For instance, those who adamantly apply this rule to the so-called General Epistles (like Hebrews) sometimes claim that the books of Hebrews through Jude lack application to Christians in the Church Age.

Furthermore, far too many teachers teach these two designations because they de-emphasize the application for the Church any writings outside the thirteen epistles beginning with Paul’s name (Romans through Philemon). Obviously, this error leads to the teaching that the books following Philemon are completely excluded from containing Church Age doctrine and application.

Yet, the entire twenty-one epistles should be classified more by the general or specific audience to whom each epistle is addressed. The point is that a general audience epistle is addressed to a broader audience. Yet, Third John addressed “unto the well beloved Gaius” reveals a more specifically defined audience.

Thus, the more appropriate designation would be a division between the Epistles and the General Epistles as follows. The Epistles include Romans through Hebrews along with Second John and Third John; whereas, the General Epistles include James through First John and Jude.

These twenty-one epistles are where the Church finds its primary doctrine, practice, and purpose. This does not mean that variations in these epistles do not exist based upon the audience receiving the epistle. The next verse could explain why God led Paul [1] to write the book of Hebrews to the Jewish Christians in the early Church and not designate it with his customary style found in all his other thirteen epistles.

1 Corinthians 9:20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;

Under the direction of the Holy Ghost, Paul tailored his message and methods to his target audience. In the case of the book of Hebrews, it is quite obvious that his target audience was uniquely Jewish in nature.

Footnote: [1] Discussion and explanation of Pauline authorship of Hebrews will be covered at length in later chapters. 

Section HProphecy (New Testament): One Book, Revelation, beginning with letters to seven first century literal New Testament churches and culminating at the commencement of eternity future. Although seldom considered by most Bible teachers, Revelation is very much a historical book.

Revelation begins with a historical record of messages delivered to seven churches and then describes the history of John’s reception of the Revelation. Finally, it describes future history as it chronicles end-time events. The focus of Revelation is not so much on instruction of practical truths, but more on the past, present, and future unfolding of events.

Another Perspective


The next chart of the New Testament shows another basic division of the books of the New Testament. Its layout also closely correlates to that of the Old Testament with the three divisions of historical, practice, and prophetic.



Notice the similarities of the New Testament layout to the following Old Testament layout. It too has the three divisions of historical, practice, and prophetic. 


Timeline Restrictions


It is important to recognize the inherent difficulties of placing books of the Bible on a time-line which by its nature is restrictive. Many of the books of the Bible contain overlapping and transitional features that a finite timeline simply cannot adequately illustrate. As has already been stated, much of the Bible contains prophecy covering periods thousands of years ahead of its initial revelation and recording.

In addition to these complexities, most prophecy finds its fulfillment fragmented. The prophecy has a partial fulfillment in the past with the completed fulfillment yet to come in a future time. There are also many instances of dual fulfillment: past and future.[2]

Thus, a book of the Bible may be placed upon the chart in the Old Testament but have content (especially concerning prophecy) yet to be fulfilled far into the New Testament. In such cases, each book shows up on the timeline in the period giving precedence to when it was revealed rather than when the prophecy will be realized. (Please note that the purpose for dividing the book of Revelation into several parts will be explained later.)

Footnote: [2] There are many examples of Bible prophecies which have their complete fulfillment in the long term while exhibiting a short-term partial fulfillment. For example, Moses writes of a prophecy of a nation “from far” which God would send against Israel if they forsook Him (Deuteronomy 28:49). The fulfillment of this verse takes place with the Assyrians (Isaiah 5:26; Isaiah 33:19; Hosea 8:1), Babylonians (Jeremiah 4:13; Jeremiah 5:15), as well as Rome (Luke 21:24).

Book Division Timing




 Section AThe Pentateuch: (~4000 BC to ~1500 BC) The Old Testament records God’s dealings predominantly with the Jews and through the Jews. The Pentateuch is no exception to that fact. However, the first eleven chapters of Genesis cover a time frame prior to the formation of the Jewish people through the calling out of Abram.  Note: Although the authors stand by the previous statement, it should be noted that Abram was called a Hebrew (Genesis 14:13) likely tying him back to his great, great, great, great grandfather, Eber (Genesis 11:14-17) or Heber (Luke 3:35).

The book of Genesis also speaks of the wanderings of the patriarchs (the Jewish fathers) ending with their settling in the land of Egypt. The remainder of this section chronicles Israel’s deliverance from Egypt along with their journey to the land of promise. Specific emphasis in this section is placed upon the provision of laws or commandments to be obeyed by the Jewish nation upon entering the land.

Section BHistory: (~1500 BC to ~500 BC) This section begins with one man (Joshua) leading a mostly united nation into the land of promise. It ends with one woman (Esther) risking her life to spare a remnant of that same nation while being held captive within a heathen land. The nation repeatedly ignored God’s laws (mentioned in the previous section), resulting in their ultimate demise. As they rejected the God that brought them into the land, they turned to the idols that had been the root cause for removal of the land’s previous inhabitants.

Just as God warned, their rebellion led Him to give both the northern (Israel) and the southern (Judah) kingdoms into the hands of their enemies. This section covers their captivities in detail. Also of notable interest: Section A to Section B has no overlap although the Pentateuch does continue; Section B to Section D overlaps by approximately 300 years. This overlap will be further explored with the details of Section D.

Section CPoetry: No defined charitable time element

Section DProphecy (Old Testament): (~800 BC to ~400 BC) For approximately 500 years, Israel as one united nation dwelt within the Promised Land. Solomon’s collecting of pagan wives and his compromise with idolatry and the worship of false gods caused the kingdom to be divided into two kingdoms following Solomon’s death. It split into the ten northern tribes and the two southern tribes. The southern kingdom (Judah) retained a king from David’s lineage while the northern kingdom (Israel) was not ruled by a descendent of David.

Unfortunately, both kingdoms were forced into captivity because they rebelled against God. Israel suffered the Assyrian captivity while Judah found itself in the Babylonian captivity.

In advance of their respective captivities, God, in His grace, sent prophets to warn of the impending judgment. These warnings were mostly ignored. For instance, Amos and Hosea were sent to Israel, while Obadiah, Joel, Isaiah, Micah, Nahum, Zephaniah, and Habakkuk were sent to Judah.

During their captivities, God sent Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel.  These prophets were sent to exhort the people, to warn of immediate judgment, and to promise deliverance. God used Haggai, Zechariah, and Malachi to minister during and after each return of the Jews to the land to help them to become reestablished.

Many of the prophecies in this section spoke of immediate deliverance taking place at the time of their writings. Their partial fulfillment indicated the deeper prophetic nature of the writings. These writings pointed forward to the work that God’s Son would accomplish in His first and second coming to earth.

Note: This section contains frequently misapplied promises usurped by those attempting to assimilate the Jewish promises into the New Testament Church. God will fulfill His promises with those to whom He made them—the future believing Israel. A lack of spiritual understanding in this matter has led to confusion, error, and even heresies. Continued ignorance will simply lead to increased confusion, additional error, and further heresies.

Section E—Gospels: (~5 BC to ~AD 29) The four Gospels are the first books of the New Testament. These books follow the thirty-nine “Old Testament” books and the roughly 400 years of silence from God. The books of Matthew through John cover a period of time of approximately thirty-three years overlapping each other in content more so than any other section of scripture. They end with the ascension of Jesus Christ, the same event which kicks off the book of Acts. (Note: “5 BC” has been used to recognize the perceived errors in the calendar dating systems.)



The four books of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are both logically and theologically grouped together as a unit. For this reason, the four Gospel books should be studied together as a unit. However, it should be noted that there is an obvious division between the Synoptic Gospels (that is, Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and the Gospel of John. Although there are likely many reasons for this distinction, John’s Gospel was written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name(John 20:31).

Note: John is the only writer that has a book in three of the four New Testament sections with Luke as the only other writer with a book in two of the four sections.

Section F—Acts: (~AD 29 to ~AD 64) The book of Acts follows the Gospel of John. As has been previously discussed, the book of Acts serves primarily as a historical and transitional book. It begins with the ascension of the Lord Jesus Christ—the last major event recorded in the Gospels (Luke 24:51). The last half focuses upon Paul’s missionary journeys and ends with the apostle Paul in a Roman prison.

As a historical book, Acts sets forth the act(ion)s of the apostles. Every diligent Bible student quickly notices that the book of Acts is not primarily a book of doctrine but predominantly historical in nature. As a transitional book, Acts transitions from the Gospels (covering the Lord Jesus Christ, Peter, and the other eleven apostles ministering primarily to the Jews) to Paul and his writings. It is very important to notice that the book of Acts features a definite and defined transition from one primary spokesman (Peter) to another (Paul).




As alluded to in Luke 22:32, Peter became the obvious leader of the apostles. The earliest chapters of the book of Acts further demonstrate Peter’s leadership role in the Church’s embryonic stages. Following Acts chapter 12, the complete shift in prominence and focus from Peter to Paul becomes quite pronounced. This point is critical for understanding the Bible!

For instance, Peter’s name appeared a total of 58 times in Acts, but only once after Acts chapter 12 (Acts 15:7). Even this occurrence in Acts chapter 15 shows Peter supporting the ministry of the apostle Paul. On the other hand, Saul (whose name is changed to Paul) appears 157 times in Acts with 141 of those occurrences after Acts chapter 12.

Section G—The Epistles: (~AD 40 to ~AD 95) The twenty-one epistles were authored by five men with the bulk of the writing being the work of the apostle Paul (obviously via the Holy Ghost)—(1 Corinthians 2:13). Seventeen of these epistles begin with the name of the author. Interestingly, John did not use his name in his epistles or his Gospel. The book of Hebrews uniquely stands apart from the other books in this section (which will be discussed later in this work).

These epistles take the Church from its infancy all the way to the throne in Heaven, providing doctrinal and practical instruction for its purification all along the way (Ephesians 5:25-27). Many of the epistles begin with doctrinal teaching followed by the practical execution of the doctrines taught. The life of the Church parallels the life of an individual. In infancy, the Church operated with the signs and wonders required by the Jews, but later blossomed into the abiding strengths of “faith, hope, and charity” (1 Corinthians 13:13).



Section H—Prophecy (New Testament): (~AD 33 to Eternity) This section is divided into three parts on the timeline because it contains relevant content covering three distinct periods: the Church Age (Revelation chapters 1-3 through 4:1); Daniel’s Seventieth Week (Revelation chapters 4-18); and the Second Coming, kingdom, and eternity future (Revelation chapters 19-22).

The first three chapters of Revelation contain letters to seven churches similar to epistles sent by Paul and the other apostles to churches (although the Revelation letters are very short). The fourth chapter sets forth John’s rapture into Heaven to receive additional revelation (also representing a wonderful PICTURE of the Church’s Rapture and its presence in Heaven prior to the onset of any part of Daniel’s Seventieth Week (commonly called the Tribulation Period).

Revelation chapters 5 through 18 expound upon the persecution of the Jews and outpouring of Satan’s wrath.  As it was in the days of Job, the Devil and man will only be able to do to the Jews that which God allows.  Therefore, the wrath depicted in these chapters is ultimately God’s wrath.
At that time, God’s attention and prophetic plan again focus upon the Jews. Chapter 19 chronicles the return of Christ with His armies. Chapter 20 describes the kingdom, the Great White Throne, and the Second Death. The final two chapters of Revelation introduce the New Jerusalem and the beginning of eternity future.